I'm a CPA and former Big 4 auditor who works the numbers side of your deal. Your analyst builds the pro forma; I take it the rest of the way, to the after-tax LP return, the recapture at exit, and a package that holds up when investors start asking questions. Because I don't broker the deal or earn a commission on it, the read stays independent of whether you buy.
Numbers that hold up because they trace back to the model.
The exit-tax hit modeled up front, not felt at sale.
Every figure easy to point back to when someone asks.
A real projection, anonymized, the same one-pager a client gets. These are the numbers a pre-tax pitch deck never shows.
Illustrative sample on an anonymized deal, not a client's pro forma. Your read is run on your own numbers.
Project work, priced per deal. The forward-looking analytics, run through the CREDevSim engine.
Send me your deal. I run it through the CREDevSim engine and hand you a short written memo you can put in front of your partners or your investment committee.
Before you commit capital or send a deck to investors, I rebuild your underwriting in the engine and stress it until it either holds or breaks.
The numbers your LPs and your IC actually read, built to trace back to the model line by line.
Ongoing, non-attest back office. The recurring work small sponsors have no one for. This is bookkeeping, controller, and review work, not an audit.
I do not file your return. I check the one your preparer produces, before it goes out to your investors, so the tax layer is right. I am your quality-control layer, not the signing preparer; filing stays with your CPA.
The back office you would otherwise build in a spreadsheet at midnight, run by a former Big 4 auditor instead. Non-attest bookkeeping and controller work.
Ongoing support for GPs who are actively acquiring and raising, the deal analytics and the fund finance under one person.
| Service | What it is | Price |
|---|---|---|
| CREDevSim App | The underwriting and after-tax modeling tool | Free |
| Deal Tax Projection & Review | Model, tax memo, and LP after-tax one-pager on one deal | from $750 |
| Underwriting & Pro Forma Pressure-Test | Rebuild and stress-test your deal model | from $750 |
| Waterfall, Promote & Investor Package | Modeled waterfall plus IC memo and raise package for one deal | quoted |
| Partnership Return & K-1 Review | Review your preparer's 1065 and K-1s before they go out | from $1,500 + $40/K-1 |
| Fund Books, Capital Accounts & Reporting | Ongoing non-attest fund bookkeeping and investor reporting | monthly, quoted |
| Advisory, Hourly | One-off questions and structuring | $275/hr |
| Fractional Deal-CFO | Ongoing monthly retainer | from $2,500/mo |
Final pricing is confirmed in a short call and set in a signed engagement letter before any work begins. Ongoing and complex engagements (fund reporting, tiered waterfalls, contributed property, cost segregation) are quoted individually.
A short call to scope it: one deal, a model that needs pressure-testing, or a fund with no back office. Your underwriting stays in the CREDevSim app on your machine, so nothing sensitive is uploaded to a shared portal.
I model, review, or reconcile, then hand you the memo, the package, or the reporting in plain language, with figures you can trace.
From there we structure the deal, coordinate a cost segregation study if it pays off, keep the fund books and investor reporting current, and work with your tax preparer so the return and K-1s come out right when the year closes.
Kasing Ng, CPA
California license 139270 · Former Big 4 auditor · Builder of CREDevSim
I am a California-licensed CPA and a former Big 4 auditor, so my instinct is the same one an auditor has: does this number tie, and can I defend it. Most CRE models are built by people who are excellent at the deal and shaky on the numbers behind it, so the after-tax return, the capital accounts, and the reporting, the parts your investors actually live with, are the parts that get guessed. I built CREDevSim to do the modeling for real: a genuine after-tax engine covering 1031 exchanges, §1245 and §1250 recapture, passive-loss limits, opportunity zones, and bonus depreciation, on top of full underwriting, capital stack, and waterfall math. When I advise on your deal, I am reading it off an engine I wrote. When I keep your fund's books, I am doing it with the same standard I was trained to audit against. And because I don't broker your deal or earn a commission on it, the read you get is independent of whether you end up buying.
If you want the background, here is how most models get after-tax LP returns wrong, and why your deal data never leaves your machine when you model it in CREDevSim.